Which choice would NOT be a justified investigatory detention of a motor vehicle?

Prepare for the Detective Test with our study resources. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with detailed explanations. Be ready to ace your exam!

The choice indicating that an officer recognizing a passenger as a known felon would not constitute a justified investigatory detention is appropriate because mere knowledge of a person's criminal history does not provide the necessary reasonable suspicion to detain a vehicle. Reasonable suspicion requires specific, articulable facts about current illegal activity, rather than just a person's past actions.

In the context of investigatory detentions, factors such as observable vehicle defects, erratic driving, or credible tips about illegal activity present tangible behaviors or reports that can be linked to potential criminal conduct. A broken tail light suggests a potential traffic violation that could be reasonably addressed by law enforcement. Erratic driving behavior indicates immediate concerns for safety and potential impairment or recklessness, justifying a stop. Additionally, a credible tip about drug activity suggests current and specific suspected illegal behavior which could warrant a detention for further investigation. Each of these scenarios involves observable conduct or credible information that aligns with the standard of reasonable suspicion, which supports a justified investigatory detention.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy