Select the true statement regarding the use of videotape for court presentations.

The use of videotapes for court presentations is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool, particularly for the testimony of expert witnesses. In many cases, experts may have scheduling conflicts or other commitments that prevent them from appearing in person during a trial. Thus, allowing expert witnesses to testify via videotape can ensure that their insights and evidence are still presented to the court without unnecessary delays. This can enhance the efficiency of court proceedings while still providing the jury with critical information.

Regarding the other statements, one might consider that videotapes can be admissible depending on their relevance and how they comply with legal standards, which makes the first statement misleading. The third statement about showing videotapes multiple times to jurors is not a requirement; it is typically at the discretion of the judge to determine how many times a piece of evidence is presented. As for the last statement, it is not accurate to limit admissible videotapes to only recordings of suspects, as various types of video evidence can be relevant and permissible in court depending on the context and rules of evidence.