How should the items discovered in a known criminal's possession be classified according to Directive# 91?

The classification of items discovered in a known criminal's possession, according to Directive# 91, should align with the context and the nature of the items. Items in this scenario are typically classified as evidence. This classification is based on the understanding that these items are not merely lost or found, but rather, they hold significance in relation to a criminal investigation or case.

Evidence is defined as anything that can be presented in a court of law to support the prosecution or defense in a legal case. Items in a known criminal's possession are likely directly linked to criminal activity, making them relevant for establishing facts, corroborating witness testimonies, or connecting the individual to a crime. The formal classification as evidence also implies that these items should be collected, preserved, and documented according to established procedures to maintain their integrity for legal proceedings.

In contrast, items classified as stolen property would denote a different aspect of ownership and unlawful acquisition, while lost and found items refer to possessions that are misplaced and not necessarily linked to any criminal activity. Recovered property might imply items returned to their rightful owners after being unlawfully taken, which doesn't capture the broader purpose of the items when they are in the hands of a known criminal. Hence, classifying these items as evidence reinforces their